Why LOREM X
Revolutionary Health Device​
Explore the unique features of our LOREM X, an advanced PEMF Wellness Device, and learn about the key distinctions that make it stand out from the competition.
Find out how choosing the LOREM X can significantly improve your overall health and vitality in an effective and efficient way.
Lorem X utilizes state-of-the-art technology that surpasses the competition.
NOTE: This page focuses on distinguishing features from competitors.
Therefore, topics such as LOREM X's high safety level will not be discussed, as we believe safety should be a priority for all PEMF wellness devices.
Effectiveness
Lorem X Driver is a highly effective PEMF wellness device.
Positive results can be expected quickly.
According to the third Law of Maxwell, having a high dB/dt is critical for effectiveness (see PEMF background).
Lorem X is optimized to achieve this goal by:
Optimized Input Signals
On the PEMF background page, we explain why the input signal's waveform is crucial.
Many producers use sinusoidal or triangular waves (claiming or not they have magical properties). Some even use music waves, suggesting that playing Rolling Stones will energize you and classical music will calm you. However, considering Maxwell's third law, these claims are nonsense, and the waveforms used are ineffective for PEMF.
LOREM X DRIVER generates square waves (large dB/dt) consisting of short pulses with a duty cycle of around 10% or,
for lower-frequency signals, the short square pulses have a maximal pulse width of 200 milliseconds.
Optimized Hardware
Coils
Inductors (Coils) are necessary to generate a pulsed magnetic field.
Sadly, inductors resist rapid changes in electrical currents, showing an inertia that causes signal waveform deformation, decreasing the effectiveness of a good, rapidly changing PEMF signal.
The strength of the Inductor (Inductance or Impedance) symbol (L), unit (H) Henry, depends on the coil's geometry and configuration, more specifically, the number of windings (N), the coil's surface (A) = π R², and the coil's length (l).
The stronger the Inductance (L), the larger the signal deformation it causes.
The figure above shows how a square input signal (VIN) is deformed over an inductor.
The voltage over the inductor (VL) and the current through the inductor (IL) are no longer square!
This no longer square electrical current generates a non-square magnetic flux (B) (no longer steeply rising and falling) having a lower dB/dt.
Due to the lower dB/dt, the final PEMF-induced Electropotential over a cell will be lower (third law of Maxwell), resulting in a less effective PEMFT.
PEMF Design Problem:
We need an inductor to generate the pulsed magnetic field. However, the stronger the inductor, the stronger the magnetic field (good), but the more deformed the signal becomes (bad, lower dB/dt).
During the device's design, the coils have to be optimized in function of the to-be-used frequencies (there is also a frequency-dependent factor, limiting the electrical pulsed current in an inductor) so that the deformation of an optimized signal is as small as possible, reaching a maximal possible dB/dt. This maximal dB/dt is the only device specification determining the effectiveness of the PEMF device in inducing an electrical field over a cell.
​​
Nevertheless (see the first point above), the input signal's waveform is also essential.
Suppose a non-optimal waveform (e.g., sinusoidal or triangular) is used with a high dB/dt PEMF device. In that case, only a fraction of this device's maximal dB/dt will be reached, lowering the effectiveness of the treatment.
On the other hand, a perfect input signal can reach the device limit, the maximal device dB/dt, but not higher!
​
When purchasing a device, always check the maximal dB/dt.
Many producers don't know their equipment's maximal dB/dt (and have not optimized this critical characteristic).
Showing a magnet flipping around in a pulsed magnetic field indicates that the strength of the magnetic field is adequate. However, this flipping around might look impressive to potential buyers but does not demonstrate a suitable maximal dB/dt or PEMFT effectiveness. The magnet may flip vigorously, even when the magnetic flux is not rapidly changing, meaning low dB/dt or low effectiveness.
​​
The LOREM X BED Applicator has optimized coils,
leading to a total copper coil weight of 110 kg (242 lb)
and a remarkable max device dB/dt = 1.54 kT/s.
A red flag concerning PEMF effectiveness is when a whole-body PEMFT device has only grams or a few kilograms of copper coil.
LOREM X DRIVER Adaptive Amplifier
We have seen above that an optimal input signal can become deformed, losing effectiveness.
Another problem is that processing low-frequency signals (f<10 Hz) is complicated and results also in signal deformations. The lower the frequency, the worse the deformation becomes.
The LOREM X DRIVER tackles the problem of all signal deformations using an Adaptive Amplifier.
The Adaptive Amplifier repairs a no-more-ideal, deformed signal in different stages during signal processing to become quasi-ideal again, allowing the devices to work at maximal equipment dB/dt.​
Above, we see an example of a LOREM X low-frequency signal, 0.1 Hz, DC 10%, programmed as a perfect, ideal square wave, but heavily deformed during its processing.
The same signal, further processed by the LOREM X DRIVER's Adaptive Amplifier, is repaired, cleaned up, and amplified, recuperating the ideal square waveform and becoming useful again for effective PEMFT.
Frequencies 0.05Hz - 300 Hz
- f = 25 Hz - 40 Hz
LOREM X Protocols DO NOT operate in this frequency range, which is known for possible cortisol production stimulation. Although this might be interesting for some particular medical treatments, it does not belong in a healing or wellness treatment; cortisol production can be harmful.
Be careful; "healing" PEMF devices with a "patented 35 Hz healing" (cortisol producing) sinusoidal waveform (low dB/dt) are on the market!
​
- Very Low Frequencies
​To tackle MECHANOSENSITIVITY (see PEMF Background) and increase overall effectiveness, LOREM X uses protocols with a frequency down to 0.05 Hz (a short 200-millisecond square pulse, followed by 19.8 seconds of recuperation time).
Most PEMF devices can not handle these low frequencies. Amplifier technology is simple, above 10 HZ, but becomes difficult below 1 Hz.
Efficiency
Multiple Axial Coil Design
The amplification factor of the magnetic flux for the LOREM X eight coils design is an amazing +5 times.
Coil Design
​The LOREM X BED Applicator coils have a minimal diameter (optimizing the inductors) but still fit a large person, reducing the magnetized unused space and optimizing efficiency.
The coils also have a straight section below the bed, further reducing the magnetized unused space and optimizing further the efficiency.
Competition
Helmholtz Coil PEMFT devices
LOW EFFICIENCY:
The Helmholtz Coil, with huge coils, offers a factual whole-body PEMF device in which the whole body is submerged in a homogeneous magnetic field but with a shallow magnetic field. (see PEMF background).
We have no access to the technical data of the Helmholtz device because the company does not publish the device specs. But based on the fact that it is a Helmholtz coil and knowing the amplification factors, estimating the magnetized unused space, taking into account the power input difference, that the Helmholtz coils are not optimized, and that they are not using an adaptive amplifier, we calculate an efficiency difference factor of 250 (including input power) compared to Lorem X.
A quick control: dividing an average LOREM X flux of 100 µT by 250 gives 400 pico Tesla.
The Helmholtz device company confirms it reaches only pico Tesla levels but claims this as an advantage. So, is a highly inefficient design, delivering difficult-to-measure, weak magnetic fields hidden by the much larger earth magnetic field, and having a low dB/dt (device effectiveness) is an advantage?
LOW EFFECTIVENESS:
These devices do not have an adaptive amplifier and are not effective.
​
Mattress type Whole Body PEMF device
​
Many different manufacturers offer these mattress-type PEMF devices.
They all have in common:
1) Not being whole-body devices; many cells in the body are not treated because of low penetration depth (shallow magnetic field) and an irregular magnetic field.
2) Being low efficient, most of the magnetic flux does not leave the mattress.
3) Not having an Adaptive Amplifier, resulting in low effectiveness.
See PEMF background.
​